Webflow or WordPress: Experts Weigh In on the Best SEO-Friendly Platform


Webflow vs WordPress SEO

Table of Contents

Get Your Free Website Audit

($3,000 Value)

  • Uncover performance issues
  • Identify SEO opportunities
  • Security gaps, and quick wins
Get Your Free Audit!

Deciding between Webflow SEO and WordPress SEO results can be daunting. This article clarifies the choice with clear comparisons and insights from SEO experts.

Learn which platform gives your site the edge in search engine rankings.

1. SEO Depends on Execution, Not Platform

Having worked extensively with Webflow and WordPress, I’ve found that the real SEO battle isn’t about which platform is inherently better—it’s about who’s driving the machine. The truth is that cleaner code and built-in speed optimisations of Webflow websites make it seem like the superior choice for SEO, but WordPress still wins if you know how to wield it properly.

I once had a growing SaaS company client who insisted on moving from WordPress to Webflow because they believed it would “instantly” improve their SEO rankings. However, when we analysed their WordPress setup, the real problem wasn’t the platform; it was bloated plugins, slow hosting, and poor site structure. Instead of migrating, we overhauled their WordPress site, ditching unnecessary plugins, optimising their Core Web Vitals, and structuring content around intent-driven keywords. The result? A 60% boost in organic traffic within five months—without ever touching Webflow.

Webflow is fantastic for designers who want pixel-perfect control without worrying about plugin conflicts. However, WordPress still dominates for content-heavy sites, provided you have the right SEO strategy. The real takeaway? SEO isn’t platform-dependent—it’s execution-dependent. If you don’t fix foundational issues, no platform will save you.

Nicholas Robb, Design agency for startups, Design Hero

2. Webflow Excels in Speed, WordPress in Flexibility

Content management systems dramatically impact SEO success through their technical capabilities and ease of optimisation. Each platform offers distinct advantages for different business needs. After building over 20 sites across both platforms, I’ve found Webflow excels in page speed optimisation and clean code structure. 

Recently, migrating a client’s site from WordPress to Webflow improved their mobile performance scores from 65 to 89, directly impacting their search rankings for competitive keywords. WordPress provides superior content management flexibility through its extensive plugin ecosystem. However, this advantage can become a liability—our e-commerce client’s WordPress site slowed significantly after installing multiple SEO plugins, requiring careful optimisation to maintain performance. 

Webflow emerges as the stronger choice for businesses prioritising technical SEO and site speed, while WordPress better serves content-heavy sites needing extensive customisation. Success depends on matching platform strengths to specific business requirements rather than following general preferences.

Aaron Whittaker, VP of Demand Generation & Marketing, Thrive Digital Marketing Agency

3. WordPress Offers Superior SEO Control

I’ve worked with both Webflow and WordPress extensively, and when it comes to SEO-friendliness, WordPress wins hands down.

Why WordPress is Better for SEO:

  • Full Control Over SEO – With SEO plugins like Rank Math and Yoast SEO, you can fine-tune everything: meta titles, descriptions, schema, XML sitemaps, and redirects.
  • Better Plugin Ecosystem – Need speed optimisation? Use WP Rocket. Need image compression? Try ShortPixel. WordPress has a huge SEO-friendly toolkit.
  • Customisation & Flexibility – You’re not limited by a visual editor. You can fully customise your site structure, page speed, and technical SEO.
  • Better Blog & Content Management – Google loves fresh, structured content, and WordPress makes blogging seamless with categories, tags, and custom post types.
  • Easier for Large-Scale SEO – If you’re managing a content-heavy site, WordPress scales better with advanced SEO features like custom taxonomies and internal linking tools.

Where Webflow Falls Short:

  • Limited SEO Tools – Webflow’s built-in SEO is okay but lacks the depth of WordPress plugins.
  • Not as Scalable – For large websites, managing internal linking, redirects, and SEO automation is harder.
  • Code Bloat & Speed Issues – Webflow pages can have extra divs and unnecessary CSS, making performance tuning trickier.
  • CMS Restrictions – The Webflow CMS isn’t as powerful as WordPress when managing complex site structures.

If you want complete SEO control, scalability, and flexibility, WordPress is the clear winner. Webflow is fine for simple sites, but for serious SEO-driven growth, WordPress gives you more power, more tools, and more long-term potential.

If SEO is a priority, go with WordPress. (Elementor builder as well.)

TJ Loftus, Local Internet Marketing Consultant, Lifted Websites

4. Choose WordPress for Content-Heavy Sites

WordPress has been a go-to platform for SEO professionals for years. With plugins like Yoast SEO and Rank Math, optimising meta tags, generating sitemaps, and managing redirects is straightforward. Plus, WordPress offers more flexibility with structured data and advanced technical SEO adjustments. However, it does require regular updates, and performance can suffer if not properly optimised (especially with too many plugins).

On the other hand, Webflow is built with clean, lightweight code, which can lead to faster page speeds (a key ranking factor). It also provides built-in SEO features, like easy meta tag editing, auto-generated sitemaps, and SSL. The biggest advantage? It eliminates the need for third-party plugins, reducing potential security risks. However, Webflow has a steeper learning curve for those used to traditional CMS platforms, and some advanced customisations (like deep schema markup) may require extra effort.

For a content-heavy website that needs extensive SEO control, I’d lean toward WordPress. For a design-focused site with performance and simplicity in mind, Webflow is a great choice.

At the end of the day, SEO success depends more on strategy, quality content, site structure, and technical optimisation rather than just the platform.

Slow website wasting your marketing spend?

  • Uncover performance issues
  • Identify SEO opportunities
  • Security gaps, and quick wins
Grab your FREE copy now!

Vivek Tank, Senior SEO Specialist, Verz Design

5. Webflow is Lightweight, WordPress is Customisable

Both Webflow and WordPress offer strong SEO capabilities, but they cater to different user needs. WordPress, with its vast plugin ecosystem (especially Yoast SEO and Rank Math), gives marketers deep control over on-page and technical SEO. It’s great for those who want flexibility with schema markup, advanced redirects, and granular optimisation. However, it can become bloated with excessive plugins, which may slow down performance if not managed properly.

Webflow, on the other hand, has built-in SEO features that make it lightweight and efficient. Clean code, automatic SSL, and fast loading speeds give it an edge in Core Web Vitals, a key Google ranking factor. Plus, Webflow allows for custom meta tags, structured data, and 301 redirects without relying on plugins. The main drawback is that it has a learning curve, and some advanced SEO tweaks (like deep plugin-based automation) aren’t as easy as in WordPress. Personally, I prefer Webflow for speed and simplicity, but for content-heavy sites needing advanced customisation, WordPress remains king.

Hamzah Khadim, SEO Expert, Logik Digital

6. WordPress Provides Extensive SEO Tools

WordPress has been my go-to choice for years. The reason is that I have found that their massive plugin ecosystem, especially tools like Yoast SEO, gives me the control I need to fine-tune my website’s SEO performance.

With that Yoast plugin, I can adjust the meta tags and meta descriptions, as well as the URL structure and optimise every page element, which is crucial when managing heavy content sites like blogs. Additionally, you can control which pages Google crawls and insert Google tracking code to monitor conversion data.

While I do appreciate Webflow’s easy and clean built-in SEO features and fast hosting, I personally value the flexibility and freedom that WordPress offers. The ability to choose from thousands of themes and plugins, lets me tailor the site exactly to the client’s needs, even if sometimes it requires more maintenance or monitoring to keep everything running well.

At the end of the day, it’s all about choosing the platform that suits your needs and project goals. For me, I will always choose WordPress; it’s a platform that I am more familiar with and the one I reach for when I need advanced SEO features.

Mei Ping Mak, Director of SEO and Web, Weave Asia

7. WordPress is Flexible, Webflow is Quick

I’ve worked on both WordPress and Webflow for client projects, and each has its own strengths in search optimisation. Personally, I lean toward WordPress because it has a ton of plugins that make my daily SEO tasks simple, like handling metadata and sitemaps.

On the other hand, Webflow is great if you value quick design changes without coding. I had a client who loved experimenting with layouts every week, and Webflow let us do that without wrecking site structure. The built-in options are decent, but sometimes I miss the extra freedom of WordPress plugins for advanced SEO tweaks.

In short, WordPress might give you more ways to fine-tune SEO, while Webflow can be faster to update if you’re big on design. Both can rank well if you handle content and site speed properly. Personally, WordPress still feels more familiar and flexible for search, but Webflow has a growing set of features that might grab your attention if you want a more visual approach.

Evgen Kushnirchuk, Marketer, Chief Product Officer, CEO, Hire Developers Biz

8. WordPress Excels in SEO Flexibility

I’ve used both Webflow and WordPress to promote websites, and while Webflow is cleaner and easier to use for people who like a visual approach, WordPress is more effective for SEO.

WordPress excels at SEO flexibility; you can have extensive control over metadata, schema, and sophisticated optimisations with plugins like Yoast SEO and Rank Math. Because of its strong blogging and plugin environment, it’s also ideal for sites with a lot of content. If not properly optimised, it can become disorganised with bloated code and slow-loading themes.

In contrast, Webflow produces clean code and includes SEO capabilities (such as auto-generated sitemaps, 301 redirects, and custom meta tags). It’s excellent for designers who want SEO-friendly websites without depending on outside tools, even if it doesn’t support as many plugins as WordPress.

I like WordPress for blogs with a lot of material. Webflow is the best option for slick, quick-loading marketing websites. Your needs will determine this!

Robin Khokhar, SEO Specialist, Tricky Enough

9. WordPress Leads in SEO Capabilities

When it comes to being SEO-friendly, WordPress is ahead by miles. Webflow, while beautiful at making websites, traditionally has caused many SEO headaches for clients who I have seen use it. WordPress has been loaded with SEO plugins and capabilities since the beginning, and I recommend it to anyone who wants a beautiful-looking website that will also actually get traffic from Google. Webflow isn’t as intuitively optimisable, and with the ease of making a site in WordPress for the average user or business, I cannot see why anyone would turn to Webflow currently.

Will Wright, Lead SEO Strategist, Direct Online Marketing

10. Webflow is Great for Design, WordPress for SEO

As someone who has worked extensively with both WordPress and Webflow, I can confidently say that both platforms can be SEO-friendly, but they cater to different needs.

WordPress is my go-to for full-scale SEO control. With plugins like Yoast SEO or Rank Math, I can fine-tune every aspect of on-page optimisation, from schema markup and XML sitemaps to content analysis and technical SEO fixes. Since WordPress allows full access to the back-end code and server settings, I have more flexibility when optimising for site speed, structured data, and advanced SEO techniques. However, it requires regular maintenance, and poorly built themes or excessive plugins can slow down a site if not managed properly.

On the other hand, Webflow shines when it comes to clean code and speed. It generates lightweight, semantic HTML and CSS, which means pages load fast—an important SEO ranking factor. It also provides built-in SEO settings like customisable meta titles, descriptions, and clean URL structures. The downside is that it lacks some advanced SEO customisation options (such as detailed schema implementation and plugin support), and for more complex sites, managing large-scale SEO can be trickier than in WordPress.

For SEO-driven projects, WordPress is my top choice. The sheer level of customisation, plugin support, and back-end control makes it unbeatable for long-term SEO strategy. With tools like Yoast SEO, Rank Math, and WP Rocket, I can optimise everything from meta tags and structured data to caching and site speed.

While Webflow is great for fast, visually stunning websites, it lacks the deep SEO flexibility that WordPress offers natively or through plugins. If I need a fully optimised content marketing strategy, intricate site architecture, or advanced technical SEO fixes, WordPress allows me to implement them without limitations.

At the end of the day, if a client’s SEO performance is a top priority, I always recommend WordPress—it’s simply the best platform for scalability, optimisation, and long-term growth in search rankings.

Stone Slade, Web & Graphic Designer | Show Host | News Correspondent & Journalist, Wet Media Digital

11. WordPress Preferred for User-Friendly SEO

During last year’s Google update, a Scottsdale broker’s Webflow site outranked older WordPress competitors for “golf course properties” despite weaker backlinks. 

Their secret? Webflow’s auto-optimised images and lazy loading created a 92/100 mobile score effortlessly. Contrast this with a Tucson team’s WordPress site that tanked after installing seven “SEO boost” plugins—each update introduced new conflicts. I guide Ylopo’s clients toward hybrid solutions: Webflow for vanity domains like “SedonaLuxEstates.com” where design impacts conversions, and WordPress for neighbourhood blogs needing weekly updates. 

Neither platform guarantees results, but Webflow’s constraints often help realtors avoid self-sabotage. One exception: large teams need granular user roles. Always match the tool to your content tempo, not trends.

Aaron Franklin, Head of Growth, Ylopo

12. Choose Platform Based on Project Needs

While the SEO capabilities of both platforms are very similar in that they allow you to structure data, edit, and optimise title tags and meta descriptions, and make on-page optimisations, I still prefer WordPress from an SEO-friendliness perspective.

Speaking as the founder of an SEO agency, we’re interested in the most user-friendly platforms so our team can make changes as efficiently as possible and keep campaigns as affordable as possible for clients. This is why WordPress is our absolute favourite. You can edit in multiple tabs without issue, and select from a range of plug-ins, and it’s generally easier to teach new staff members how to use.

For this reason, I also recommend that new businesses, when building a website, select WordPress over Webflow—it will save them money in the long term.

Aled Nelmes, Founder & CEO, Lumen SEO

13. WordPress is Better for Content-Heavy Sites

Even though Webflow and WordPress have solid SEO features, each one serves a distinct purpose, making it difficult to determine which is superior, as it fluctuates based on the intricacy of the project and the desired level of customisation.

In my opinion, Webflow has a more streamlined, visual method of web design which can be beneficial for marketers and designers trying to efficiently implement SEO best practices without getting too technical. Webflow features automatic generation of clean, semantic HTML, seamless addition of Google Analytics, management of metadata, alt text, and header tags. 

Other features include the automatic generation of sitemaps, 301 redirects, and great server-side performance. Being able to control the visual design is among the most significant benefits, enhancing user experience, which is critical for SEO. On the contrary, Webflow can be restrictive in scalability and plugin integration for larger, content-heavy sites.

Otherwise, WordPress works better for content-heavy websites because it has a rich ecosystem of plugins, including SEO-focused ones like Yoast SEO and RankMath. With WordPress, you can literally do everything. You can customise your site with plugins for schema markup, site redirects, and even page speed optimisations. 

The downside to this is that most WordPress sites are high-maintenance and users have the tendency to bloat their sites with unnecessary plugins that could slow the site down. This would impact their site speed and performance, which is a very important factor in SEO. Nevertheless, for bigger companies or those with huge content management requirements, WordPress is usually the better option because it is scalable and flexible long-term.

In the end, my preferred option depends on the size and requirements of the project. Webflow has clear design structures, which makes it cleaner and easier to use for small, design-focused sites. For bigger, content geared projects, WordPress is the go-to software because of how flexible it is, the vast options of plugins, and the strong community support. Both platforms can be friendly for SEO if optimised properly, but the specific needs of your website will dictate what platform you should choose.

James Allsopp, CEO, iNet Ventures

Conclusion

Both Webflow and WordPress have strong SEO potential, but their effectiveness depends on how they are used. Webflow is valued for its speed and simplicity, while WordPress stands out for its flexibility and extensive SEO tools. Neither platform guarantees high rankings. What truly makes a difference is how well they are managed.

The industry experts agree that the best choice comes down to specific needs. Webflow’s clean setup is ideal for those who want built-in optimisations, while WordPress is better suited for content-heavy sites that require greater customisation. Regardless of the platform, focusing on site speed, content quality, and technical SEO is the key to long-term success.

Book A Free Consultation

Get Your Free Website Audit

($3,000 Value)

  • Uncover performance issues
  • Identify SEO opportunities
  • Security gaps, and quick wins
Get Your Free Audit!

Updated on: 6 March 2025 |

WordPress

Nirmal Gyanwali, Director of WP Creative

Nirmal Gyanwali

With over 16 years of experience in the web industry, Nirmal has built websites for a wide variety of businesses; from mom n’ pop shops to some of Australia’s leading brands. Nirmal brings his wealth of experience in managing teams to WP Creative along with his wife, Saba.